Why JAMB UTME 3 Years Result Validity Should Be Cancelled – Prof. Is-haq Oloyede

Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr

The Registrar of the Joint Admission Matriculation Board [JAMB] Professor Is-haq Oloyede, has given reasons why the JAMB UTME Result Validity won’t be acknowledged by the senate.

During an interview with him on move by the Senate to extend the validity period of the Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME) by three years and the benefit of the extension to the admission seekers below is what he has to say.

I believe it is not desirable to extend the validity period of the UTME results and we are going to engage the policy makers to have a reconsideration of that position. The reason given for it was cost but in the long run, that will not reduce cost. You do not extend the validity of a screening examination; what JAMB conducts is called the screening examination.
You do not screen a person for a particular purpose and extend the validity period of the results. It is not a certification examination, it is meant for a purpose. It’s just like somebody writing screening examination for NNPC employment and you say the result should be extended. What certification examination entails is that it is not a one chance exams, you do a continuous assessment over two or three years as the case may be and the exam is not only one sitting, it can be more sittings.

RELATED:  UNIUYO 2015/2016 Pre- Degree Admission Placement List

Even when you do the Senior School Certificate Examination (SSCE) apart from the fact that 40 per cent is continuous assessment, 60 per cent that is written is not one examination; you have parts one and two but that is not the case of UTME which is structured as screening examination. In a screening examination, there is no pass or fail; it depends on the availability of space.

RELATED:  UI 2016-17 Distance Learning 1st/Supplementary Admission List Out

May be my predecessor made this known to them but what I found on record is that my predecessor had made it clear that it is undesirable and I think it is not in the interest of this nation because it will make us a laughing stock in the comity of examination bodies because you don’t extend the type of questions we set. Again, when you say it’s for three years, each of the examination is linked with the syllabus the candidates are going to meet at the higher institutions; so, it will create a lot of problems. The Senate will be persuaded by reasons to drop that type of extension.

Write A Comment